IISc scientists find a compound in mammals that can restrict coronavirus
Indian scientists have identified a
naturally-occurring biochemical in the human body as a potential
broad-acting antiviral agent that could serve as a shield against
multiple viruses, including influenza, dengue, and SARS-CoV-2, the virus
that causes Covid-19.
The researchers at the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore,
have through tests on lab-grown cells and experimental animals
discovered that the biochemical called picolinic acid has strong
antiviral activity against a wide range of enveloped viruses that cause
illness in humans.
In the cells, picolinic acid showed antiviral effects against the Hong
Kong, alpha, beta, gamma, and delta variants of SARS-CoV-2 and against
the seasonal and H1N1 pandemic influenza, dengue, Japanese encephalitis,
Zika, human parainfluenza and herpes simplex viruses. In the animal
tests, picolinic acid obstructed virus replication and the disease
process in hamsters infected with SARS-CoV-2 and in mice infected with
an influenza virus.
“All these viruses follow a common step as they seek to infect human
cells — picolinic acid blocks that common step,” said Shashank Tripathi,
assistant professor at the Centre for Infectious Disease Research at
the IISc who led the studies.
The IISc has staked patent claims on picolinic acid’s antiviral
effect. “Our lab and animal studies look promising, but they’ll need
extensive follow-up through even more detailed animal studies and
clinical trials in humans,” said Tripathi.
Sections of scientists have cautioned that
while the concept and premise underlying picolinic acid are reasonable
and the results not surprising, more research would be critical to
determine if its preliminary promise holds up.
Picolinic acid is a natural byproduct of an
amino acid called tryptophan present in high-protein food such as milk,
fish, chicken, cheese, or pumpkin seeds and which occurs in small
concentrations in human milk, the pancreas, and the cerebrospinal fluid.
Tripathi and his colleagues had turned their
attention to picolinic acid three years ago — before the emergence of
SARS-CoV-2 — noting hints of its antiviral activity against the human
immunodeficiency virus and herpes simplex virus from a US lab two
decades ago and against the chikungunya virus from an Indian lab in
2018.
While its mechanism of antiviral action
remained unclear, an independent study by South Korean researchers in
2018 had suggested picolinic acid might interfere with the entry of
substances into cells — a critical step in viral infections as all
viruses need to enter cells to cause infection.
The IISc scientists have now shown through
their experiments that picolinic acid blocks the viral entry process by
disrupting the viral membrane — a microscopic envelope-like coating on
the virus — and blocking the fusion of the virus with its target cell.
“Picolinic acid’s antiviral effect shows up
only against such enveloped viruses,” Tripathi said. Whether SARS-CoV-2
or other enveloped viruses, the virus first attaches itself to a target
cell through a protein-protein interaction, then its membrane fuses with
the cell membrane to complete its entry.
By blocking viral entry into target cells,
picolinic acid prevents the virus from multiplying and causing
infection. Tripathi said antiviral agents that prevent viral entry block
the lifecycle of the virus before the virus can multiply and acquire
mutations that might help it evade antiviral activity.
“Picolinic acid appears to be a natural
antiviral substance. Our animal studies suggest that oral administration
is well-tolerated and leads to an antiviral effect,” Tripathi said.
But several compounds such as
hydroxychloroquine that showed antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 in
cells or animals haven’t lived up to their promise.
“The antiviral effects of chloroquine are
likely mediated by similar or related pathways,” said Satyajit Rath, an
immunologist in Pune not associated with the IISc study. “Problems in
safely achieving prolonged effective concentrations of such drugs in the
body are possible reasons for the failure of hydroxychloroquine in
clinical trials.”
One concern, Rath said, is that blocking
constantly ongoing cellular properties in all cells of the body such as
processes that control the entry of substances into cells is unlikely to
be without consequences.India’s department of biotechnology-BIRAC and
the DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance, a UK-India research partnership,
funded the IISC research.